Problem Statement
After the 2025-2026 flood-control scandal — ~10,000 projects worth ₱545B flagged as substandard, overpriced, or never built, plus arrests of lawmakers and DPWH engineers — barangays still flood every habagat while audit teams drown in PDFs. Citizens see a listed dike on paper but open water on the ground, with no way to prove it. The President ordered a full DPWH audit, but communities need their own verifier now, not after the next Typhoon Inday.
Proposed Solution
Enter a project ID or tap your barangay: GhostBaha pulls the public DPWH project list, budget, and coordinates, overlays recent satellite imagery and before/after flood maps, and asks residents for 3 geotagged photos (upstream, mid, downstream). Vision AI checks for dike, wall, or dredging signatures; an LLM writes a plain-Tagalog finding (“Nakalista: 200m floodwall 2024, ₱45M. Nakita: walang wall sa 180m”) with confidence and a printable evidence pack for COA, Ombudsman, or media.
Target Market
- Primary users: Flood-prone barangays in Bulacan, Pampanga, Cagayan, NCR esteros, youth watchdogs, campus journalists.
- B2G: LGU engineering offices, DILG field teams, COA auditors needing triage.
- Secondary: Newsrooms covering the flood-control trials at Sandiganbayan.
How AI Is Used
- Vision change detection: Compares listed structure footprint vs satellite + citizen photos; flags missing or collapsed works.
- LLM evidence writer: Turns coordinates, budgets, and image verdicts into a filing-ready Tagalog/English brief with sources.
- Duplicate clustering: Groups 50 reports of the same ghost stretch into one case so auditors aren’t spammed.
- Why AI: 10,000 rows can’t be field-checked by hand; vision + language makes citizen proof usable.
PLDT / Smart / ePLDT / Rokid Angle
- Smart: SMS short code for photo reports from non-smartphone users; alerts feed network-level flood comms.
- ePLDT: Hosts imagery cache and evidence vault in-country for COA chain-of-custody.
- PLDT Enterprise: Sells LGU “audit assist” bundle with connectivity.
- Rokid (optional): Field engineers see listed-vs-actual overlay on-site.
Demo Scenario (3 minutes for judges)
- Search a real-style mock project: “Malabon estero wall, ₱45M, 2024.” Map shows listed alignment.
- Satellite overlay shows open bank; upload 3 mock citizen photos — AI verdict: “NEEDS PIVOT”
- Evidence pack generates: budget, coords, images, flood history from habagat 2026.
- Show a legit project for contrast: “LIKELY PRESENT — 80%.”
- Close: “Mahiya naman kayo — may resibo na.”
30-Hour Build Plan
| Hours | Task | Role |
|---|---|---|
| 0–3 | Scope, gather public DPWH lists, pick 3 mock sites | All |
| 3–9 | Map + satellite overlay, project schema | Backend/GIS |
| 3–12 | Vision check + LLM evidence prompts | AI lead |
| 9–18 | Photo upload + clustering | Backend |
| 16–26 | Evidence-pack UI + print | Frontend |
| 26–30 | Rehearsal, pitch, disclosure | All |
Suggested stack: Next.js + Leaflet, FastAPI, Sentinel-2 imagery, YOLO dike-detector, Gemini LLM, Postgres. Public data / APIs: DPWH project lists, COA audit reports, Sentinel-2, Project NOAH, news archives on flood scandal.
Risks & Privacy Notes
- Defamation risk: Verdicts labeled “AI-assisted lead, needs field audit” — never accuses persons, only flags structures. Links sources.
- Data Privacy Act 2012: Citizen photos auto-strip faces/plates; no names stored without consent. Demo uses synthetic barangays and mock photos only — no real personal data into AI tools.
- IP: Satellite under open licenses; team owns prompts and schema.
AI Use Disclosure (draft)
Uses YOLO-based vision for structure checks and an LLM for Tagalog/English evidence summaries. AI coding assistants helped scaffold map UI. All demo verdicts were human-checked against mock ground truth.
Rubric Scoring
| Criterion | Weight | Score (1–5) | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Innovation & creativity | 25% | 5 | Citizen satellite audit of ghost projects is timely and new |
| Problem–solution fit | 25% | 5 | Directly answers the ₱545B scandal + habagat floods |
| AI application & value | 20% | 4 | Vision + LLM essential for evidence |
| Feasibility | 15% | 4 | Public lists + imagery demoable in 30h |
| Impact & scalability | 15% | 5 | Every flood barangay can file |
| Weighted total | 4.60 |